| |
What North Carolina Makes,
Makes North Carolina
PrElImINary rEPort
Complete results will be published in August 2008.
Manufacturing’s Value ProPosition
for a state on the go
Prepared by:
Graham S. Toft
Growth Economics, Inc.
Sherry B. Melton
North Carolina Chamber
|
|
|
 |
| |
CONTENTS
FOREWORD
1. INTRODUCTION AND
PURPOSE....................................................................... 3
2. PRELIMINARY
REPORT...................................................................................
4
3. SNAPSHOT: NORTH CAROLINA WITH AND WITHOUT MANUFACTURING ......... 9
4. CONCLUSION AND FOLLOW-UP.....................................................................15
|
|
 |
| |
FOREWORD
Dear North Carolina Chamber Member,
It is my honor to introduce the following report
to you with thanks to the North Carolina Chamber for quantifying the true impact of manufacturing on our North
Carolina economy. Perhaps more importantly, the report captures key issues that we must focus on if our
communities are going to continue to grow and thrive.
We could view this report as a summary of our
history and put it on a bookshelf. Or we can use it to continue to build on the strong manufacturing foundation
North Carolina has today to proactively and positively shape our state’s future. I am proud that you – leaders
of our state – have embraced the future and not the past.
This report, and the larger project it supports,
provides us with a critical opportunity to join together and have a collective voice. In the following pages
you’ll see the value and promise of manufacturing in North Carolina, along with key issues that we must continue
to address to make sure our state is a leading place in the world to do business. Leadership from the North
Carolina Chamber is invaluable as we develop action plans that will continue to position North Carolina as “the
place” to work and call home.
Our combined efforts to continue to evolve the
state’s business climate, help companies remain competitive and attract workers to manufacturing will be crucial
to our success in the years to come.
After all, “What North Carolina Makes, Makes
North Carolina.”
Sincerely,

Ellen T. Ruff
President, Duke Energy Carolinas
|

Page 1 |
|
| |
Manufacturing Matters
in nc toDay,
shoWs ProMise for the future
As North Carolina’s official manufacturing association – the state affiliate
of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) – it simply makes sense for our Chamber to commission a
project to reveal both the value and promise of this vital economic sector. The North Carolina Chamber is a
champion of our state’s manufacturers, and for good reason.
The benefits and economic impact of manufacturing in North Carolina are great
– historically and today. And contrary to what we too often hear and see in the public dialogue, the growth
potential of modern manufacturing here is significant.
North Carolina is the seventh largest manufacturing state in America.
Manufacturing provides good jobs for our state’s residents with wages that are substantially higher than in
non-manufacturing jobs. Manufacturing has a greater multiplier effect on the rest of our economy than any other
industry sector. And manufacturing drives private-sector development and innovation – leading to advanced
technologies and products that improve our collective quality of life.
In 2007, our Chamber launched its Manufacturing Council to advance the
priorities of North Carolina’s manufacturers in the legislative, regulatory and political arenas and foster an
environment that will enable them to remain competitive in a global economy. Our overarching goal is to attract,
retain and create even more of these good jobs for the people who choose to live and work here.
With all that manufacturing has to offer and it’s critical role in our
economy, it is imperative that state leaders, policymakers, media and the public understand its benefits and the
impact of our collective decision-making and perceptions on its future here. The North Carolina Chamber is
committed to facilitating that understanding and this important project is just one example. On behalf of our
Chamber, I extend sincere thanks to Duke Energy for sponsoring our work.
Manufacturing still matters in North Carolina. And it will matter well into
the future, but only if we recognize its value and promise, and are willing to provide the competitive
environment and tools necessary for manufacturers to flourish in today's flat, fast-paced world.

Lew Ebert
President and CEO, North Carolina Chamber
|
|

Page 2
|
|
| |
1.
introDuction anD PurPose
The North Carolina Chamber is on a mission “to ensure that North Carolina is a leading
place in the world to do business.” This bold initiative requires working on many fronts – one
of which is shining light on and repositioning the state’s manufacturing sector, a 20th century
economic foundation with continuing promise in the 21st century.
The state of North Carolina can boast a gradually improving economy for over 60 years.
Gone are the days when the state was mostly rural, fueled almost exclusively by low-skill
manufacturing and agriculture wherein few went on to college. It has since added vibrant
tourism, financial services, high-tech industries and developed highly regarded academic
institutions.
North Carolina has retained a strong name for manufacturing, held onto a “growth state”
image and been well ranked by economic development commentators, such as Site Selection
magazine, as a good place for investment. Major economic restructuring has been taking its
toll, however, and in recent years North Carolina’s textiles, furniture and telecommunications
manufacturing industries have been hard hit by international competition.
In May 2007, the North Carolina Chamber convened its first Manufacturing Summit as a
concerted effort on the part of the business community to review the changes affecting North
Carolina manufacturing.
This project is a next step – a major initiative to carefully document challenges, opportunities
and action plans for positioning North Carolina’s manufacturing sector for change and growth in
the 21st century. This preliminary report and its underlying surveys and data analyses begin to
summarize a seven-month investigative and brainstorming phase between September 2007 and
April 2008 and its findings. A complete report will be published by the North Carolina Chamber
in August 2008.
This project is ultimately about jobs – growth in quality jobs. Quality job growth is vitally
important to improving state per capita income, a broad measure of economic well-being. This
initial report demonstrates that production manufacturing is shedding jobs while upgrading
the remaining ones to higher-skill, higher-paying jobs, a desirable condition of advancing
economies. At the same time, more support and service jobs are being created by the
‘multiplier effect’ as manufacturing reaches deep into the North Carolina economy. In reality,
high productivity in both manufacturing and services go hand-in-hand in winning states.
This project has been an opportunity to take stock of what North Carolina has rather than what
has been lost. Most importantly this project is about the essential role manufacturing will and
must play in North Carolina’s overall economic growth going forward.
|
|

Page 3 |
|
| |
2.
PreliMinary rePort
The message of this preliminary report from a North Carolina Chamber project, “What North Carolina Makes,
Makes North Carolina” is strong and clear: manufacturing is alive and well in the state. It has been through
some rough times during this decade, but the sector remains a major contributor to the North Carolina economy.
North Carolina manufacturing firms and workers are showing amazing agility and notable flexibility. This
decade 12 percent of the state’s manufacturers can be described as ‘growth businesses’ with average annual
employment growth of 12.6 percent and annual sales growth of 10.3 percent – hardly a sign of an industry in
decline. These businesses are at the forefront of a very exciting and promising industrial transformation taking
place across the U.S. and leading to higher levels of innovation, increased productivity, stimulating and
rewarding jobs, and global integration in 21st century manufacturing. What is occurring could be described as a
kind of ‘quiet industrial revolution.’
North Carolina is the seventh largest state for manufacturing as measured by the percent of total state gross
domestic product (GDP). It is the second largest in non-durables manufacturing, such as textiles, apparel,
leather goods, chemicals and energy. As of January 2006, there were 21,543 manufacturing establishments
(operations with separate ‘lines of business’) in North Carolina employing 728,207 workers with $83 billion in
sales.
Without manufacturing, the North Carolina economy would be approximately two-thirds its size today and have
an annual average earnings per worker of 5.6 percent lower than today’s statewide average. It is in the state’s
best interest to ensure competitive investment conditions for a healthy manufacturing sector for the foreseeable
future. High-productivity manufacturing, combined with a highly productive service sector, will ensure economic
progress and improve North Carolina’s prospects of becoming a ”top-10 state” in the nation on per capita income.
(With 2006 per capita disposable income at $28,408, the state currently ranks 38 among the 50 states.) This
project is ultimately about jobs, growth in good jobs to improve North Carolina’s standard of living and quality
of life.
For every manufacturing job in North Carolina, an additional 1.7 jobs are created indirectly through
buy-supply relationships with support industries and retail and household purchasing by those directly employed
in manufacturing. In total, this ‘multiplier effect’ means that 29 percent of the state’s employment and 37.5
percent of its output in goods and services are attributable to manufacturing. The state was the No. 1 state in
non-durable goods manufacturing for decades (especially textiles and plastics), but its mix of manufacturing
industries is changing and becoming more diversified. Vibrant younger industries include: boat building,
agriculture, construction and mining machinery manufacturing, architectural and structural metals manufacturing,
and aerospace products and parts manufacturing.
|
|

Page 4 |
|
| |
Manufacturing remains a ‘buzz issue’ across the state because:
 |
Job losses this decade have caused business, personal and community hardships. It should be noted,
however, that as a top-10 manufacturing state nationally, North Carolina had relatively more to lose as
manufacturing nationwide lost employment this business cycle. |
 |
Some are frustrated and resentful that “jobs are going offshore,” while overlooking the fact that ‘talent
jobs’ and innovation are growing on-shore as a result of high technology and international trade. |
 |
Jobs in manufacturing aren’t as easy to come by as in the past because they require more knowledge,
training and teamwork skills. |
 |
While still successful, economic development entities at state, regional and local levels are facing tough
competition in recruiting manufacturing investment to the state. (Even more job growth is expected to occur
from entrepreneurial initiatives from inside the state; North Carolina’s resurgent boat industry is an
example.) |
 |
While some fear mainline manufacturing is going away, it is actually transforming and adapting, while
remaining a critical growth agent for the state and nation. In fact, there are signs of a resurgent industrial
sector in the U.S. as global demand for advanced U.S. products increases. |
 |
A widely-held view that “as manufacturing goes, so goes the state” still holds. |
Defining manufacturing in today’s economy is becoming more difficult. North Carolinians know that
manufacturing no longer means getting more low-paying, low-skill factories. Manufacturing includes a complex
‘value chain,’ including advanced research and product development, market research and branding,
high-tech/high-performance production, advanced logistics and after-market service.
For the purposes of this report, ‘production manufacturing’ is defined by NAICS codes 31-33 in federal
statistics. In addition, where possible, this report’s economic impact analysis takes into account those
industries linked both ‘upstream and downstream’ to mainline production – often called ‘the multiplier effect’
(i.e. If manufacturing were not here, various other firms/jobs would not be here.)
Key storylines from this project to date are:
 |
Manufacturing is a global industry. Its ebbs and flows are influenced by constantly shifting
competitiveness abroad. For North Carolina to be a leading manufacturing state in the U.S., it must be a leader
globally. That means it must be constantly on watch to create a favorable business climate that matches the best
locations both nationally and overseas. |
|
|

Page 5 |
|
| |
 |
While jobs are declining in the U.S. manufacturing sector relative to the size of the total economy,
manufacturing output is not. In other words, manufacturing productivity continues to shine, resulting in
strong profits and better-paying jobs.
|
 |
Manufacturing productivity is remarkable. It leads to fewer jobs per unit of output while rewarding
higher-skilled workers with higher pay. North Carolina cannot compete on low-skill jobs, and why should it? A
goal of state economic growth is to continue to upgrade jobs to higher pay. The positive gap between earnings
per job in manufacturing and the state average has been widening yearly for several decades – a very real
contribution to the state.
|
 |
While recruiting new investment into the state remains important, most new manufacturing jobs are being
created by existing business.
|
 |
There are lots of manufacturing growth stories in North Carolina – particular businesses and specific
industries. Indicating a healthy entrepreneurial climate between 2001 and 2006, 10 manufacturing industries
were identified as ‘positive growth’ performers, including: architectural and structural metals, motor vehicle
parts, ship and boat building, aerospace products and parts and sugar and confectionary products. Industries
that had a concentration of growth businesses of 15 percent or more included: primary metal, beverage and
tobacco, and plastics and rubber products.
|
 |
Off-shoring and on-shoring of manufacturing production are occurring simultaneously and quite routinely.
While traditional low-skill/low-paying jobs move offshore, foreign direct investment moves on-shore resulting
in new advanced/high-skill manufacturing facilities. > Both growth and decline are occurring in the
manufacturing sector, a sure sign of a dynamic industry in change. To truly understand manufacturing one must
track what is occurring industry by industry, business by business. For example, textiles and medical devices
is a ’tale of two industries.’
|
 |
Manufacturing is no longer a dirty industry. It is “going green,” and has been for some time – probably
faster than most other industries. Doing things better, faster, cleaner and greener makes money for North
Carolina firms while the state becomes more environmentally sustainable and energy efficient at the same time.
|
 |
Manufacturing firms are learning to become more agile and workers more flexible. |
Key issues deserving further deliberation in next phases of this project include
- North Carolina’s Manufacturing “Brand image” as a Place to Work: The North Carolina brand as a good place
for manufacturing is very much intact, as indicated by Site Selection rankings and “best places to do
business” rankings by CNBC and Forbes. But manufacturers sense slippage in public image and government
enthusiasm for the industry. They are experiencing greater difficulty recruiting young talent into very
promising high-tech, rewarding jobs.
|
|

Page 6 |
|
| |
“Manufacturing made this country strong. now many leaders don’t
speak the language."(Roundtable participant)
- Agility, the New Modus operandi: What all manufacturers face in common
is a fastpaced, quick-changing business environment. They are being creative and many show determination to stay
in North Carolina. For high performance they need predictable state and local operating conditions where
decisions affecting them by governmental entities and educational providers are timely, responsive and
innovative.
“it’s all about finding the niche! if it’s a commodity product we can’t compete.” (Roundtable participant)
- Flexibility – North Carolina’s New Worker: Smart workers today make themselves both valuable to
current employers and marketable for their future by constantly gaining new knowledge, learning new skills and
sharpening attitudes and interpersonal skills. Their best path to employment security is training. North
Carolina has a well-regarded postsecondary delivery system, but closer ties between manufacturing and community
colleges, in particular, will enhance competitiveness.
“We have a tsunami coming – loss of experienced baby boomer workers, growth of high-skill jobs and young
people going elsewhere to live, play and work.”(roundtable participant)
- Pro-investment Policies: The primary drivers of economic growth are innovation, quality workers and
investment. Winning states are those that get the formula right for spurring investment – project and R&D
investment, infrastructure investment and human capital investment. A necessary foundation is sound business tax
policy. In considering changes to North Carolina’s tax policy a common beginning point must be the following:
tax policy is de facto industrial policy in today’s open market economy.
- Trade and Infrastructure: While trade policy is primarily a national responsibility, states can
shape the trajectory of their manufacturing economies by ensuring uncongested, competitively priced freight
movement. Over the next decades, U.S. freight tonnage is expected to increase by close to three percent
annually, and transportation and warehousing employment is expected to grow at 1.1 percent annually. This
industry is tightly linked with manufacturing growth. As global trade increases, further infrastructure
long-range planning and financing become imperative – for rail, ports, airports, pipelines, waterways and
highways.
- Capital Access for Growth: North Carolina ranks well among states for risk capital and conventional
financial services. In particular, venture capital and conventional banking have a healthy presence.
Manufacturer financing often falls in the “mezzanine” category – specialty debt financing that enables
small/mid-size firms to be closely held by individuals, families and partnerships. While major capital-access
gaps are not apparent, many North Carolina small and mid-size manufacturing firms are 30 or more years old, at
which point succession planning and/or corporate restructuring might be occurring in the next one
|
|

Page 7 |
|
| |
to two decades. The state is endowed with several experienced private and university support organizations to
help in this regard. This issue deserves watching, however, to ensure that all North Carolinians, including
women and minorities, have the opportunity to become part of the ‘ownership class’ in the state’s
manufacturing industry – at the same time increasing the odds that such firms remain locally held.
- Reliable, Competitively Priced Energy for the Long Haul: Recent research indicates that low-cost
energy strongly correlates with state economic growth. Healthy manufacturing states will be those that take
bold planning and financing steps now to foster conservation and efficiency and diversify supply. North
Carolina manufacturing has benefited from low-cost energy in the past. This capacity can adapt to new
environmental requirements, but additional ‘quantum-leap’ solutions may be required to address long-term
growth realities. A comprehensive strategy to sustain the industrial base deserves utmost priority.
- Healthcare Costs Matter: In addition to competitive energy pricing, research indicates that the
other business cost factor most correlating with state economic growth this decade is health care. A recent
analysis by the New America Foundation found that “many manufacturers have blamed rising healthcare costs for
decisions to drop health benefits for workers or shift jobs overseas.” North Carolina manufacturers complain
that healthcare costs are outpacing wages and productivity. They do not want to pass these costs on to workers
by lowering wages and find it increasingly difficult to raise prices in extremely competitive markets. This
threatens their ‘bottom lines‘ and reasons to exist. Like the energy situation, those states that put bold,
market-responsive initiatives in place to address healthcare costs stand to gain the most as good places for
manufacturing for the long haul.
|
|

Page 8 |
|
| |
3.
snaPshot: north carolina With
anD Without Manufacturing
“While U.S. manufacturing itself is the eighth largest economy in the world, its impact on the overall U.S. economy is much
larger when [the] ‘multiplier effect’ is taken into account.” NAM “Importance of Manufacturing” 2006 This report
includes a quick overview of the size and contributions of manufacturing to the state. It does this by briefly
comparing what North Carolina looks like with and without manufacturing. As of January 2006, there were 440,005
active private business establishments (operations with separate ‘lines of business’) in North Carolina. Of
these, 9,638 were headquarters of multiestablishment firms. The remaining 430,367 were branches to these
headquarters or ‘standalones.’ Of this total, 21,543 establishments were engaged in production manufacturing.
Combined, all establishments created 3.71 million jobs and $424.16 billion in sales, while the manufacturers
contributed 728,207 in direct jobs and $82.77 billion in sales. In a nutshell, here is what the state looks like
with and without manufacturing and its related business:
 |
State Gross Domestic Product: The final value of all
goods and services produced in the state (GDP is primarily composed of employment compensation and gross
business profits – a good aggregate of productive capacity.) |
| |
|
North Carolina GDP including
manufacturing, 2006 |
North Carolina GDP without
manufacturing and its
multiplier effect, 2006 |
|
$374.5 billion |
$233.9 billion |
|
|
Manufacturing’s $140.6 billion of output accounts for 37.5 percent of the state’s GDP. This
includes manufacturing’s direct output plus the indirect output of supply-buy linkages with non-manufacturing
and the extra output generated by household purchases of those who work in manufacturing – called the indirect
and induced effects or ‘output multiplier.’
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, IMPLAN
|
|

Page 9 |
|
| |
Figure 1
|
Manufacturing GDP as % of Private GDP, Inflation-adjusted 2006
|
|
Rank |
State |
Share |
|
|
| Indiana |
| Oregon |
| Idaho |
| Iowa |
| Wisconsin |
| Kentucky |
| North Carolina |
| Alabama |
| Arkansas |
| New Mexico |
|
|
33.4% |
| 30.5% |
| 25.6% |
| 25.5% |
| 25.5% |
| 24.3% |
| 24.2% |
| 24.0% |
| 24.0% |
|
23.8% |
|
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
|
Figure 2
Nondurable GDP as % of Private GDP, Inflation-adjusted 2006
|
Rank |
State |
Share |
|
|
| Louisiana |
| North Carolina |
| Indiana |
| Arkansas |
| Iowa |
| Wisconsin |
| South Carolina |
| Georgia |
| Alabama |
| Kentucky |
|
|
15.1% |
| 14.0% |
| 11.0% |
| 10.9% |
| 10.0% |
| 9.9% |
| 9.8% |
| 9.1% |
| 8.8% |
|
8.7% |
|
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis |
Figures 1 & 2: Seventh largest manufacturing state in America. North Carolina currently ranks
seventh among the states for manufacturing as a share of state private gross domestic product. Non-durables are
still driving manufacturing in North Carolina but have been hit hardest by employment losses due to decline of
the textiles and related industries. At the same time several durable manufacturing industries such as primary
metal or machine manufacturing have shown signs of strong productivity improvements with gross domestic
product-per-job rising continuously this decade. With the advent of high-tech nondurables manufacturing, the
worst of jobs lost overseas might be over. Now the focus turns to value added, productivity and developing and
keeping good talent.
|
|

Page 10 |
|

Figure 3: As manufacturing goes, so goes North Carolina North Carolina has seen a decline in manufacturing’s share of state private-sector GDP over the last decade.
In fact, manufacturing’s recent downdraft is a major reason for the state’s slowdown this decade. Admittedly,
the last three decades have seen a substantial drop in the share of workers in manufacturing – it’s a global
phenomenon.
Nevertheless, at 16-19 percent of total employment, including the self-employed, manufacturing is still North
Carolina’s largest industry and it continues to pay very well, especially offering opportunity for those without
extensive post-secondary preparation. Average compensation per worker in 2006 was $58,516 for manufacturing and
$44,604 for all private industries. (Contrary to popular belief, average compensation in the manufacturing
sector has not fallen behind that of the economy.) Without continued support for manufacturing over the next
five to 10 years, the North Carolina economy simply will not be able turn up fast enough to regain economic
losses experienced over the past five years.
 |
Jobs: Annual employment in all industries covered by state unemployment insurance (full-time and part-time) |
|
North Carolina annual employment including manufacturing, as of third
quarter 2007 |
North Carolina annual employment without manufacturing and its multiplier
effect, as of third quarter 2007 |
|
4,061,824 |
2,882,990 |
|
|

Page 11 |
|
Manufacturing accounts for 29 percent of the state’s total employment, estimated at 1,178,834 jobs. This includes
the jobs of those directly employed in manufacturing and the jobs created in support firms and industries as a
result of supply-buy linkages with manufacturing, plus those jobs generated by the household purchases of those
employed in manufacturing (sometimes referred to as the ‘jobs multiplier’ Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics,
IMPLAN
 |
Annual Earnings: Salaries/wages, supplements to salaries/wages and proprietor income |
|
North Carolina annual earnings including manufacturing, 2006 |
North Carolina annual earnings without manufacturing and its multiplier
effect, 2006 |
|
$219.0 billion |
$144.5 billion |
Manufacturing accounts for 34 percent of the state’s total earnings by place of work. This includes the earnings
of those directly employed in manufacturing, both as employees and proprietors, and of those employed in support
firms and industries engaged in supply-buy linkages with manufacturing, plus the earnings of those selling household
services to those employed in manufacturing (sometimes referred to as the ‘income multiplier’). Source: Bureau
of Economic Analysis, IMPLAN
 |
Sales Growth in North Carolina: The average annual sales growth of the private sector from the 2001
recession to 2005. |
|
North Carolina business annual sales growth including production
manufacturing, 2001-2005 |
North Carolina business annual sales growth excluding production
manufacturing, 2001-2005 |
|
2.6 % / year |
3.6% / year |
Manufacturing hit a rough spot this decade. Manufacturing sales growth at -1.1 percent per year from 2001 to
2005 was below that for all North Carolina businesses combined at 2.6 percent. Also, manufacturing employment
growth, at +1.7 percent, has been below that of all state businesses combined at 4.6 percent. This demonstrates the
advantage of a well diversified economy such that the impacts of one industry not doing well can be softened by
other industries doing better. Source: National Establishment Time Series (Dunn and Bradstreet; Walls and
Assoc.)

Page 12 |
|
| |
 |
Average Annual Earnings: Total annual wages and benefits per job (salaried and hourly jobs combined) |
|
North Carolina average annual earnings including production manufacturing, 2006 |
North Carolina average annual earnings excluding production manufacturing, 2006 |
|
$41,179 |
$38,893 |
The annual average earnings per job in North Carolina manufacturing, $59,964, were 46 percent higher
than the statewide average in 2006. Without manufacturing, the average annual wage in North Carolina would
be 5.6 percent lower than it is today with manufacturing. This gap was only 18 percent in 1990, evidence
that manufacturing has been adding higher pay to jobs considerably faster than the state average growth in
earnings. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
 Figure 4: Manufacturing wages remain well
above average North Carolina’s manufacturing average compensation per worker ranks 5th among all 19
private industries in the state, surpassed only by management of enterprises/companies, utilities, finance
and insurance and mining.
|
|

Page 13 |
|
| |
 |
Merchandise Exports |
|
North Carolina merchandise exports, including all manufactured products, 2007 |
North Carolina merchandise exports excluding those manufactured, e.g. Ag.
exports, 2007 |
|
$23.35 billion |
$1.58 billion |
Over 93 percent of merchandise exports from North Carolina are manufactured goods. Other merchandise
exports include: agricultural and livestock products, oil, gas, minerals and ores, publishers’ commodities,
waste and scrap, used or second-hand merchandise, goods reexported and re-imported, and some miscellaneous
special classifications. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division
Snapshot Bottom Line:
Even though manufacturing job and sales growth softened this decade, the magnitude of manufacturing’s
contributions to the North Carolina economy remained quite remarkable. Overall, manufacturing delivered
nearly 30 percent of all jobs – direct and indirect – and approximately one third of total earnings. Much of
the state’s growing exports were attributable to manufacturing, an important ‘balance of trade.‘ In
addition, without manufacturing the state would be only two-thirds its size in annual wealth creation
(economic output) and have fewer good-paying jobs, which on average pay nearly 50 percent more in
manufacturing compared with the statewide average.
|
|

Page 14 |
|
| |
4. CONCLUSION AND FOLLOW-UP
The growth pattern of particular industries is never steady or unidirectional. Most industries that make
up a modern dynamic economy experience ups and downs, particularly financial services, construction, mining,
energy production and manufacturing. Even parts of the more predictable service industries fluctuate from
time to time, however – e.g. specialty health services, vocational education and entertainment.
The complete report of this North Carolina Chamber project “What North Carolina Makes, Makes North
Carolina” – to be published in August 2008 – will explore whether the recent downturns in manufacturing are
a sign of further decline or a harbinger of growth ahead after a period of transformation and realignment.
In addition to an in-depth look at North Carolina manufacturing in the 20th century, it will highlight the
industry’s 21st-century renaissance in five distinct dimensions. It will reveal the prospect for
manufacturing growth in North Carolina in coming decades, identifying trends and positive growth industries
and businesses. Finally, it will emphasize policy areas and potential action items that are key to
positioning the state’s manufacturing sector for North Carolina’s ‘next dance.’
Ultimately, the full report from the North Carolina Chamber, “What North Carolina Makes, Makes North
Carolina,” will conclude that there is indeed growth ahead for manufacturing in the state. Given a
conducive, pro-investment policy environment, North Carolina can look forward to more wealth creation from
its manufacturing sector in the future, which will result in quality job growth and opportunities for an
improved standard of living and quality of life.
|
|
|
| 
Page 15 |
|
| |
North Carolina Chamber
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27607
(919)
836-1400 www.ncchamber.net |
|
|